Tackling medical student stress: beyond individual resilience

tional, and institutional factors [3]. Despite the recognized role of the educational environment in creating student stress, however, most interventions have been aimed at the individual student. Educators are encouraged to foster resilience, teach coping strategies, and ingrain habits of selfcare [4]. But, as Dyrbye has noted, medical schools have a responsibility that extends beyond promoting self-care, and includes establishing the kinds of learning environments that support student wellbeing [5]. Individual approaches to stress reduction are thus essential, but insufficient. Medicine’s historical tendency to build stress-resistant individuals rather than to build wellness-supporting environments may reflect the values of the profession. Stress permeates medical practice, and so some stress is necessary in training. Moderate amounts of stress may in fact enhance performance [6]. We must be sure about what we are trying to accomplish with health-promoting programmes within medical schools; abolishing stress is neither achievable nor desirable [7]. Indeed, students must learn to shoulder the stress of the profession with a resilience that preserves their humanity and compassion. But is surviving a stressful educational curriculum the best route to resilience? Many studies suggest the opposite. Instead of creating individuals who can navigate stress with their humanity intact, our curricula are fostering depression, anxiety, and burnout in our students [8]. Curricula do not simply materialize. We build them, brick by brick, on a foundation of deliberate pedagogical decisions. And we can rebuild them when cracks in the foundation appear. Reconsidering long-endorsed pedagogical choices can reap significant wellness rewards. Several studies have shown, for example, that a move from a graded to a pass-fail assessment system reduces medical student stress without compromising their performance on exit examinations [9, 10]. And Kiessling et al. have demonstrated that Stress plagues medical students, and risks sapping the motivation and compassion we so badly need them to maintain. Recognizing this risk, medical educators have responded with interventions that enhance students’ coping and time management skills and bolster their psychological supports. Offices of learner wellness have sprung up at medical schools around the world. Why, then, do surveys continue to highlight alarming levels of stress and burnout among students [1]? Kotter et al.’s study of stressors and health-promoting interventions at a German medical school, although modest in scale, usefully redirects our thinking away from individual students and towards setting and system issues [2]. In Kotter’s study, curricular stressors dominated student focus group discussions. Inadequate prioritization of course material, unbalanced workload distribution, long working hours in some courses, and burdensome examination scheduling contributed to student stress. Students’ suggestions for health promoting interventions focused more on reducing sources of stress than on boosting their own coping skills. They proposed modifications to the stress-inducing elements of the curriculum, including redistributing the workload, prioritizing the content, emphasizing clinical relevance, and reconsidering the grading system [2]. Students’ experiences of stress are shaped by both internal and external influences. Individual vulnerability to the negative effects of stress interacts with curricular, organiza-